6 Comments
User's avatar
MJ's avatar

Don’t forget the option to take the 30 year and throw in one extra payment each year. Shaves about 9 years off of a mortgage and still allows for flexibility of savings.

Gary E.'s avatar

He referred to that idea.

Michael Lavering's avatar

👍my first home, I added an extra $100 every month and it would have cut my term to about 21 years, also.

Of course that was decades ago, today that $100 would now be 300-500.

Javier A. Marrero's avatar

This analysis assumes you keep the house for 30 years, which is not the norm. Many people move before fully paying their house. In the 30-year scenario, if you sell before the 10th year you have barely made a dent in your loan principal. Unless the property has appreciated significantly, you will walk out basically with the same down payment you put in, minus the depreciated value of a now 10-year old house.

Megan's avatar

I’m 100% on team 15-yr. To me, no amount of money in the market (she says, hyperbolically) is as comforting and owning a home with no mortgage.

Michael Lavering's avatar

I used to advise my younger clients to do the 30-year mortgage, easier to qualify for one. And two “you don’t want to be married to your house”.

A fourth senecio put the difference into a deferred compensation plan, tradition IRA. Since it is tax deferred your return in higher.

Throw your first senecio in the garbage, no bank I know of has the same rate for both loans.

And even your 7% rate of return is a little optimistic, retirement planners usually use 4-5%.